Thursday, August 7, 2008

I-SEARCH


  I-Search


1. What I know?

-abortion is one of the most controversial subjects amongst politics, religion, and every day life.

-abortion was legalized for American women in 1973 based on the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court case.

-this court decision was in favor Roe, deciding that all laws prohibiting abortion were a direct violation of privacy and freedom under the constitution.

-prior to the legalization of abortion in America, women resorted to back alleys and illegal clinics where the procedure was performed unsanitary using chemicals or metal tools.

-many countries still have abortion outlawed.

-In both countries that legalized and outlawed abortion, the abortion rate was the same.

-50% of the pregnancies in America are unintended or unexpected

-half of this rate results in unwanted pregnancies


2. What else I want to know?

-personal stories or interviews with women who have dealt with the situation of an unwanted pregnancy and chose abortion.

-information on countries where abortion is outlawed.

-the statistics on the amount of abortions and risk involved where it is outlawed.

-pro-life vs. pro-choice debate.


3. Where can I find more information?

-google (of course)

-the library

-women's magazines

- international news resources

-a book on Roe vs. Wade


4. Interview with Alexandra Morales, who is one of my close friends and was "hit" with an expected pregnancy.


*1.-Q: First off, what point are you currently at in your life?

   -A: I am 18 years old, I earned my G.E.D from Leto High School when I was 16, have completed a full year Hillsborough Community College, and I am happy with my status.


*2. -Q: What reasons or choices that you've made have influenced your progress and happiness in life so far? 

   -A: About a year ago, I ended up pregnant from my boyfriend of 3 years and I decided to have an abortion. This choice I made was not easy, but success in college and happiness in life both do result from this decision.


*3. -Q: What was your first reaction to discovering your pregnancy?

    -A: To be completely honest with you, I was happy for a split second. But soon this happiness faded with the thought of me being a mother and responsible for another child. I was shocked and scared. I knew I wasn't capable of being good parent.


*4. -Q: Why do you think you couldn't handle parenthood?

    -A: Simply because I still like to have fun, party, and have my own life. When one takes on the responsibility to be a mother, you have to give up your own life. I still have dreams and goals that I wouldn't be able to accomplish with a child on my side.


*5. -Q: What is your goal in life? What do you want to be when you "grow up?"

    -A: I am currently taking business classes, but I am not exactly sure what I want to for a career. I do know that it is my goal to earn a Bachelor's degree in human resources so I can be some kind of manager of a business.


*6. -Q: What was the hardest part of making you decision to go through with the abortion?

    -A: Terminating the potential life of a child that I produced was obviously a tough decision. In a way I look at it as being selfish for myself in a good way. With me opting out of motherhood, now I am able to fully dedicate myself and focus on college.


*7.- Q: Did you consider or think about adoption? Why?

    -A: I though about adoption, but then I thought if I am going carry this child for nine months and go through all the symptoms of pregnancy, then I will keep  it. Even in the case of adoption, the pregnant woman is still basically raising that child because she has to be careful and cautious of what she eats, the activities she's involved in, and it's overall uncomfortable.


*8. -Q: Do you regret your decision, wish you would have done something different, or think about your choice?

    -A: I do not regret having an abortion, I regret being irresponsible and not being on birth control. I think about my decision every day and although it's not pleasant to think that I terminated the development of my child, I know that was the best decision for me and my life.

  

5. What have I learned?

-how controversial and never ending the fight for abortion is.

-the immense and overwhelming need for legalized abortions in so many other countries.

-how American women got abortion legalized (Roe vs. Wade in 1973).

-the risk and danger involved in women inducing abortions on themselves.

-the severity of pro-life advocates in some countries (Poland and Ireland).

-half of pregnancies in the America are unintended and half of that result in unwanted pregnancy.

-mothers that go through with unwanted pregnancy do not put forth the same quality of parenting skills that mothers do with wanted pregnancy.

Reflective letter!

Throughout my experience in English Composition 1101, I have studied many novels, articles, and films and have polished up my writing skills tremendously. In studying these many forms of novels, I have broadened my own techniques and rhetoric of writing. There is so much more to writing a paper than just putting words together in context with the specific topic. Through this course I have discovered that my  writing needs to appeal and make sense to not just myself or my professor, but the wide range of audience as well. The use of formatting, tone, level of formality, and genre all need to be taken into consideration to write a successful paper. Prior to this class, I would write as if my audience knew what I was talking about and was given all the background knowledge that I had, but I now know that I must write as if they know nothing about the specific topic. I also mastered the use of the three different rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. Using these three appeals gives my audience a better understanding and grasp of the subject being written about. 

Reading and writing have so much more of an impact than just entertainment or for a grade in class. Reading is ultimately how we gain and expand our knowledge. The more a person reads, the more subjects, ideas, and practices that person is exposed to. During the lapse of this course, I discovered that reading is so much more effective when you write or reflect on in, like with our blog assignments. If one reads but doesn't summarize or reflect on the reading, they won't retain or apply any of the information just read. In doing these blogs, project one, and project two, I realized that writing involves research and knowledge, not just opinion and view point. I learned that there is a series of steps involved including research, evaluation, synthesis, organization, and application when writing.

The most important skill I gained during the course of this class was editing and revising my writing. I've realized that writing is continuous process, never complete because you can always add more detail, information are broaden the subject and theme. With this said, the papers and essays I write in college need to go through many drafts and revision before being turned in. With my participation in the writing workshops, class assignments, and discussions, I obtained many unique and in-depth methods of editing. My favorite method is done by simply reading each sentence at a time and locating the subject, verb, and object and then thinking of a more specific word or phrase for the original one. I also now know how to really critique my writing and I can notice and admit when I know it needs a lot more work and revision. With the almost everlasting load of assignments and projects in this class, my laptop and I became best friends. Literally, I have spent more time on my laptop than I have been with my boyfriend in this six weeks, revealing to me that technology and and an overflow of sources are the backbone and basis of writing. 

Along with my new found research, editing, and application techniques, I also realized the importance of the basics in writing, such as format, grammar, spelling, punctuation, paragraphing, and documentation. There are many different types, forms, and genres of writing and therefor all require different elements of writing. The tone and structure should follow the genre and main idea of the piece. English composition has taught me an immense amount of writing and editing techniques.

Sunday, August 3, 2008

The subject on modern society's educational system is something I am so very adamant about. The clip on YouTube.com was very enlightening and hopefully impacted teacher's tactics on education. The clip bluntly pointed out that computer skills are not just a catalyst to research and learning, but an essential element to excelling in college. The internet provides us with information from years ago, resources that we could never got a hold of without it. Google can pretty much give you a huge variety of resources to whatever topic being searched. Not only is the web a best friend to research, but also provides students a hands-on and different approach to learning. Blogs, video/audio clips, wikis, email, webcasts, and just technology in general gets students involved and interested in the material. It also allows them to practice the essential computer skills necessary for today's growing technological day in age. In my own experiences, I have found that teachers who are obsessed with the rules of no cellphones, ipods, or laptops in class get little respect and participation within the class room. The article on Ivory Tower by Marcellus Hall clearly outlines the need for technology in school, starting at younger ages. Basically adults attempting to get degrees late in their life don't stand a chance in college, due to their lack of computer skills. I believe technology is a great tool in educating students.
1. For the teachers who oppose the need  for technology in education, how can stand firm with your beliefs after seeing the difference in those educated in technology?
2. To what extent or limit should technology be used in the classroom?
3. What type of learners are the majority of students currently attending school?

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Letter to editor:

Derek,

Your article "Tug-of-war over the right to choose" informed me on the 

drawn out fight for abortion in so many countries, like Poland. I was irate after I read this, 

I guess it's because I'm accustom to the right to abortion in here in America.

If the law in Poland states that abortion is permitted only in 3 cases, then why was it

still impossible for Agata to get the procedure done there? Basically the law favors

doctor's "personal choices" not to abort the fetus. The law also allowed Fr. Krzysztof,

a pro-life activist, to harass and separate this 14 year old from her mother. 

I just can't believe that Krzysztof allowed her number to be released to the internet

and all these strangers just stampeded in her personal world. That is crazy to me.

In all reality, all these "pro-life activists" really did was induce extreme stress on 

Agata and the un-born child which is the main cause of mis-carriage. On top of 

chasing this teenager through the streets and following her to another hospital, 

these people were texting her phone and emailing her. That is a ridiculous violation

of privacy and should have been avoided or stopped by the law. True equality 

means everyone has the right to make choices best for their lives. Maybe the government 

of Poland needs to examine who their law actually promises equality to. I thought 

this article was written very well and you did a good job of keeping your opinion

anonymous. I would like to know your opinion on this issue if don't mind sharing. 

Thank you for your time,

                       Alexandria


In class poem:

Although it may not pleasant, all women should be entitled to abortion.

Forcing a young or unprepared female to have a child is like distortion.

What is "freedom" without the right to choice?

In something as serious as parenthood, I think the only determining factor should be the woman's voice.

Sunday, July 27, 2008

The Irish Times
July 26, 2008 SaturdayTug-of-war over the right to chooseBYLINE: DEREK SCALLYSECTION: NEWS FEATURES; News Features; Pg. 4LENGTH: 2809 words
The dramatic case of a 14-year-old girl who sought a termination to her pregnancy became a high-profile battle between the two sides of the bitter Polish abortion debate, writes Derek Scally.
ON A BUSY Warsaw street, a dazed teenage girl trots to keep up with her mother, who strides through the crowd, throwing anxious glances behind her. A small woman is following them, running to keep up. The mother hails a taxi and jumps in with her daughter.
"Just drive, just drive!" she screams at the driver. Outside, she hears the small woman calling in the taxi's licence plate on her mobile phone. Then the passenger door is ripped open and their pursuer climbs in.
"Leave us alone, woman!" screams the mother.
The smaller woman ignores her and barks at the speechless taxi driver: "If you don't want to have problems with the police you'll stay right where you are." The woman delivering the orders isn't an undercover police officer chasing bank robbers. She is a pro-life activist; the prize she is chasing lies inside the 14-year-old.
It's the dramatic high point of an extraordinary tale that played out last month, of an ordinary mother and daughter in the limbo of Poland's abortion laws, caught between passive public officials and intimidating pro-life activists.
The story began several weeks earlier when Anna, a single mother in Lublin, southwest Poland, got a call from a local gynaecologist. The doctor said that Anna's daughter was pregnant, even though she was underage. The father, also underage, was a boy in school, the circumstances of the pregnancy unclear. Today, Agata, the pseudonym by which the 14-year-old is now known in Poland, is reticent about how she became pregnant.
"I knew I was pregnant but it didn't feel like it was happening to me," she says, sitting in a Lublin basement bar, studying her fingers as she relives her ordeal. She is a gamine, dark-haired girl with jewel-like eyes, one minute a nervous child, the next an engaging young woman. She is a collection of pubescent contradictions who falls silent when her mother interrupts her.
"She knew she was pregnant, but she didn't know what it meant," says Anna, a thin, outspoken woman with long blond hair and a friendly, tired smile.
"When I heard, I just thought: 'What to do? What to do? Go somewhere, do something.' I felt like I was watching my own life from a distance."
When mother and daughter agreed that an abortion would be best, Anna knew they would have a fight on their hands. But she says she had no idea of the battle they would face.
Along with Ireland, Poland has some of the most restrictive abortion legislation in Europe.
Termination is permitted in only three cases: where the life or health of the mother is at risk, where the foetus is severely and irreversibly damaged or incurably ill, or where the pregnancy is the result of a criminal act. In Agata's case it was the third category: both she and the boy were minors. But the reality of modern Poland is that these already restrictive laws are applied even more restrictively. Gynaecologists may refuse to perform an abortion for reasons of conscience. If so, they are obliged under law to find another doctor who will comply with the woman's wishes. But there is no legal mechanism to sanction doctors who refuse to do so, which often happens.
"The government accepts that women have these limited rights to abortion under the law, but says it doesn't have an obligation to make these rights real," says Wanda Nowicka, head of the Women's Federation in Warsaw, and the country's leading campaigner for the liberalisation of reproductive rights.
Some 30 years ago, she says, women from all over Europe headed to communist Poland for abortions. Today, Poland is experiencing a return to "traditional" Catholic values with an active pro-life lobby and a growing number of doctors who refuse to perform even legal abortions. In 2006, among 10 million Polish women of a reproductive age, just 340 women had legal abortions, down from 682 a decade earlier.
RECENTLY IN PARLIAMENT, a new law to allow for the protection of life from the moment of conception only narrowly failed to pass.
"It's a top-down movement of Catholic clergy, opportunisitic politicians and conservative lawyers that want further restrictions," says Nowicka, pointing to a recent survey showing that 46 per cent are in favour of more liberal regulations. With the restrictive regulations, between 50,000 and 80,000 women have back-street abortions each year, costing as much as 4,000 Polish zlotych (EUR 1,200) a time; others travel to Britain, Ukraine and Belarus. An unknown number order so-called "abortion pills" via the internet.
Anna and Agata decided against a backstreet abortion and decided to proceed officially. It was a decision they came to regret as one hospital after another in Lublin rejected their request, claiming they were unsure whether they were legally entitled to perform the procedure.
"The law is clear on this, it's people who make it complicated, and you can create obstacles if you want, without fear of disciplinary proceedings," says Monika Gasiorowska, lawyer for Anna and Agata.
"Officials told Anna she needed one statement, then another, she needed signatures, then witnessed signatures. All unnecessary obstacles. This was a crime, we had statements, but they kept putting obstacles in her way."
As her mother battled the bureaucrats, Agata spent a week waiting in a Lublin hospital as the 12-week deadline neared, after which it would be illegal to have an abortion.
A frequent visitor was Fr Krzysztof Podstawka, a pro-life activist and head of the local church-sponsored centre for single mothers. Fr Podstawka, a tanned, handsome 39-year-old, grew up in Lublin. At a cafe behind the city's Catholic University, he speaks in an earnest, modulated tone about how he became involved in the Agata case.
"I heard through the hospital that there was a girl there who needed help. There were signals that her decision to have an abortion was not fully independent," he says. "I decided to drop by to talk to her because I felt she should know all her options. I got the impression after talking to her that here was a girl who was expecting my help."
Today, he declines to elaborate on who at the hospital contacted him, and is unclear about what signals he received. But, after meetings Agata several times, he produced a letter from her in which she wrote that she was prepared to keep the baby.
"Fr Krzysztof pressured me to write the letter. I didn't think he would use it against me," says Agata, shaking her head at the memory. "He cared more about the baby than me, he would have done anything to save the baby without any regard for me."
Fr Podstawka denies pressuring Agata to write the letter, claiming she had told school friends that she wanted a baby.
After a week and no abortion, Agata and Anna left the Lublin hospital. Fr Podstawka heard through sources he declines to identify that they had contacted the Women's Federation and were travelling to Warsaw to go through with the abortion.
Mother and daughter, confident they had left their problems behind in Lublin, were shocked when the priest walked into the Warsaw clinic. "I had business in Warsaw and decided to drop by the hospital," he says.
Anna and Agata don't believe that; they say he obtained Agata's medical records from fellow pro-lifers at Lublin hospital, a breach of patient confidentiality.
"He went to the hospital in Warsaw on purpose, 1,000 per cent," says Anna vigorously. "I'd cut off my hand to swear that he came to the hospital on purpose." Shortly after Fr Podstawka arrived in Warsaw, Agata's details appeared on the internet and events spiralled out of control.
HUNDREDS OF E-MAILS began arriving in the hospital administration office, and the phones starting ringing incessantly. A crowd of pro-life campaigners picketed the hospital entrance and smuggled in gifts to Agata: a box of chocolates with a card reading "Open your heart"; a foetus development picture book. Anna's hopes that everyone would leave them alone were draining away, replaced by constant, growing psychological pressure.
"We wanted to be polite to Fr Podstawka as we're talking to you now," says Anna. "But I simply cannot understand how complete strangers forced themselves so brutally into our lives with no respect whatsoever."
As a media circus pitched up outside the hospital, the hospital director and a city official held a crisis meeting with Anna to explain why they would not now be able to perform the abortion.
"They showed me hundreds of e-mails from pro-lifers, starting with one from Fr Podstawka, containing Agata's personal data. I was so emotional I broke down in tears," says Anna. "I started screaming: 'What the f**k do they want from us?' Then the city hall official said that if they went ahead with the abortion, the protesters would ruin the hospital. 'They won't leave us alone, they'll destroy the hospital's reputation, women will be afraid to come here in future.' "
Unknown to Anna at the time, pro-life campaigners had lobbied Lublin family court to strip her of custody of Agata. The grounds: suspicion that she was forcing her daughter to have an abortion. A fax to that effect was sent to the hospital in Warsaw, just as a distraught Anna left with Agata, pushing her way through the crowd of campaigners outside.
One of them followed them through the streets of Warsaw, shouting "Agata, I love you!" When that didn't slow them down, she cornered them in the taxi, announcing: "This woman has been stripped of her parental rights."
"I don't know how she knew about the Lublin court ruling," says Anna. "It wasn't even public yet."
By now in panic, Anna dragged Agata from the taxi and hailed a passing police car that took them to the next police station. When the police heard about the Lublin court decision, Fr Podstawka had shown up once again, and mother and daughter were returned to Lublin in a police van. There, they were separated and Agata was placed in juvenile care.
After two unsuccessful attempts to have an abortion, confronting a pro-life mob and being chased through the streets of Warsaw, the 14-year-old was still pregnant and now very much alone. She was headline news, but her only contact with the outside world was the chirruping of her mobile phone, delivering text messages of "support" from strangers as well as a steady stream of texts from Fr Podstawka.
He says she contacted him first after he gave her his number. She says the messages were initiated by him, and that he made her number public on the internet.
"He would keep sending messages," Agata remembers, "saying things like: 'People from Krakow, Warsaw and Poznan are joining together to help you. Be brave.' " After 10 hours in the juvenile home, she began bleeding heavily and was rushed to hospital and placed in an isolation ward, away from her mother. For Anna, this was the lowest point in the ordeal.
"They put her in isolation to enable her to make up her own mind. It was just too much to have so many people judging us, judging me as a bad mother, a good-for-nothing," she says.
Unknown to her, assistants of Fr Podstawka were still able to visit Agata. As the pressure continued to build, health minister Eva Kopacz was forced to intervene. She arranged for Agata to travel to a clinic in another city for the termination. After that news leaked via a Catholic news agency, pro-life campaigners called for the minister's resignation; others are campaigning for her excommunication from the Catholic Church.
The health ministry declined requests for an interview, noting only in a written statement that, in Poland, the "right of a pregnant woman to have an abortion in limited circumstances is equivalent to the right of a doctor to deny health services for reasons of conscience".
IN MANY WAYS, the Agata saga is of the government's own making. Two years ago, Poland was instructed to guarantee access to legal abortions by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. It awarded damages to Alicia Tysiac, a 36-year-old woman who had sought an abortion when her doctor warned that giving birth again would seriously damage her already failing eye-sight. She was passed from one doctor to the next, each delivering a different diagnosis about the risks of giving birth, until it became too late to terminate the pregnancy. After giving birth, she suffered a retinal haemorrhage, and her sight deteriorated drastically.
In Strasbourg she won costs and EUR 25,000 in damages and a ruling that the Polish government "must not structure its legal framework in such a way as to limit" legal access to abortion. Poland had breached Tysiac's rights by not having an effective mechanism to rule on whether she had met the legal conditions for a legal abortion.
Two years on, provisions to change that situation are in political limbo in parliament, along with the rest of a health reform bill.
"The government has still done nothing," says Tysiac, the euphoria of last year's ruling long past. "There is a complete lack of interest by the government in the situation of women, and they don't act unless they absolutely have to."
She is not sure that the situation will even improve for women refused legal abortions, particularly if the proposed appeals body is filled with doctors who have conscientious objections to abortion.
An even greater obstacle in the battle for greater reproductive rights, says Wanda Nowicka of the Women's Federation, is widespread public hypocrisy towards abortion.
"The hypocrisy extends to women who come to us seeking help. They say they are actually anti-abortion but need an abortion just in their own, special case. It's difficult to plan a revolution with people like that."
HYPOCRISY ABOUT abortion is not limited to Poland, but the Agata case did demonstrate several other uniquely Polish elements.
The strength of the religious right in Poland means that, in the public debate on abortion, it is able to define the terms, for instance, warning that liberalising abortion laws will create what they term a "culture of death".
Public officials defer to these groups, wittingly or unwittingly, and demonstrate little knowledge - or interest in knowing - about Poland's human rights obligations under various international treaties.
The most Polish element of the Agata saga, however, is a tradition of public piety, one that compels people to actively and publicly intervene in a stranger's personal decision. In the battle to prevent a "culture of death", it seems that the end justifies almost all means.
"After learning about the case, I was prepared to do virtually everything for her," said Fr Podstawka. Today, he says he regrets how the case turned into a media circus, and that Agata had an abortion. However he says he acted in clear conscience and alone, denying that he leaked Agata's details. But Agata and her mother say they have seen proof that he did just that.
"Even if law permits abortion of a pregnancy resulting from a forbidden act - sex between minors - it doesn't mean you have to agree to it," says Fr Podstawka. "From the beginning I acted as a man of faith who tried to help a girl in a difficult situation. We lost this battle but the war is not over."
Asked how she may have given him the impression that the decision to terminate the pregnancy was not her own, an incredulous Agata replies with a flash of anger in her eyes.
"Let's put it this way: if the leader of a pro-life movement wants to protect a baby, what else would he say?" In the moral hall of mirrors of modern Poland, little is as it appears. Fr Podstawka sees himself as a man of moral convictions who saw a girl in need and an unborn life to protect. Speaking to him, it is clear that, far from the Polish media portrayals, he is a measured, earnest and intense man of genuine conviction. Women's groups condemn Fr Podstawka for taking a 14-year-old girl hostage in an ideological battle, and the government for allowing him to do so. But the silent majority in Poland isn't lining up to support them in their condemnation.
Agata and Anna feel harassed and betrayed, but have limited options for redress: the only clear breach of the law was the leaking of Agata's medical details. Their lawyer is doubtful that they would secure a conviction if they pursued a case.
"Every day I have to repeat that it's over, it's gone, it won't come back," says Agata slowly. "I will feel it's over once I am able to cry and shout in Fr Krzysztof's face after all he's done to me: 'You shouldn't have done that. All those people shouldn't have done that to me.' I need to do that."
Her mother shakes her head, gathering herself up to head home. "That's not the way to do it, you can't do that," she says. "All I want, the way to solve this, is for our public servants to perform their duty."
Anna and Agata's names have been changed

Saturday, July 26, 2008

The article by Liliana Escobar was about the increasing trends of obesity, smoking, alcohol use, sexual behaviors, and violence of the adolescents in modern society. The article regarded information on how media, television, radio, movies, and video games impact these statistics. Although this article has experimental studies and statistics to prove it's theory, there were a few "influences" that were brought up that I didn't agree with the connection made between them and these statistics.  I'm not saying that entertainment containing violence, sexual activities, and drug use are beneficial to a person or healthy but that this content doesn't directly and exactly account for these statistics. Alcohol and drug usage amongst adolescents has been a "trend" for years. In the 70's what do you think the teenagers were doing? Partying, smoking, "chillin' out"... that decade is known for the hippies and "peace" movement. My own mom has told me stories about her younger years of parties and drunken nights. Another point I thought about while reading this was about the violence in movies, television, and video games and it's effect on the statistics. When video game creators make their games, they are ultimately trying to sell their product, so they make what modern society wants or demands. I'm sure that there are many scenarios where adolescents learned or found out something negative from some form of entertainment, but if this is what sells in our society then that is what will be on the market. This article did inform me on a lot of things I didn't know about influences on our generation, like the obesity rate.

The article about preserving certain games was kind of cool because most wouldn't think it to be important. Instead Lowood found them to be looked at as a cultural artifact.

Questions:
1. Would anyone suspect that increasing rates of teen pregnancy have any correlation with women's continuous  fight or "rebellion" for equal standards and  outer perception?
2. Is media the one to blame for exposing adolescents to violence since they are simply reporting the news?
3. What are some other reasons that video games could be considered important or worthy of note?